Currently released so far... 3891 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AE
AR
AG
AJ
AFIN
AU
AM
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ACOA
AEC
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
AS
AL
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AGMT
CJAN
CH
CU
CASC
CVIS
CMGT
CO
CI
CLINTON
CIA
CG
CF
CN
CS
CAN
COUNTER
CIS
CA
CBW
CM
CE
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CD
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CDG
CJUS
CARSON
COUNTERTERRORISM
CACM
CDB
CV
EU
EFIN
EG
ETTC
EINV
ENRG
EI
ECPS
EINT
ECON
EIND
ETRD
EPET
EUN
EZ
EMIN
ELAB
EAID
EAGR
ET
EC
EAIR
ENVR
ES
ECA
EWWT
ER
ELTN
EFIS
EN
EXTERNAL
ECIN
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IR
IZ
IS
IT
INRB
IRAJ
IN
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
IAEA
ITPHUM
IV
IPR
IWC
IQ
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
ITALY
ITALIAN
INTERPOL
KE
KTFN
KDEM
KJUS
KNNP
KGHG
KZ
KIPR
KWBG
KIRF
KPAO
KDRG
KHLS
KCRM
KSCA
KPAL
KISL
KG
KACT
KN
KS
KGIC
KRAD
KU
KCOM
KBIO
KMCA
KCOR
KV
KHDP
KTIP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KSPR
KTIA
KHIV
KPRP
KAWC
KOLY
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KMDR
KPKO
KTDB
KMRS
KFRD
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KUNR
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KOMC
KAWK
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KMPI
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
KNUC
KPLS
KIRC
MARR
MOPS
MU
MASS
MY
MNUC
MCAP
MA
MO
MTCRE
MG
MASC
MX
MCC
MZ
ML
MK
MTRE
MP
MIL
MDC
MTCR
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MR
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MPOS
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
PGOV
PREL
PINR
PO
PINS
PTER
PK
PHUM
PARM
PL
PE
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PGOF
PROP
PARMS
PA
PM
PMIL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PNAT
PROV
PEL
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
SU
SA
SY
SP
SNAR
SENV
SCUL
SW
SOCI
SF
SO
SR
SG
SMIG
SL
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
STEINBERG
UK
UNSC
UG
US
UZ
UP
UNO
UNMIK
UY
UN
UNGA
UE
UNESCO
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
USUN
USEU
UV
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04THEHAGUE1446, G/TIP MILLER MEETS DUTCH FOREIGN AND JUSTICE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04THEHAGUE1446.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04THEHAGUE1446 | 2004-06-10 18:06 | 2011-01-27 00:12 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy The Hague |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 001446
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KCRM PGOV PHUM SMIG NL
SUBJECT: G/TIP MILLER MEETS DUTCH FOREIGN AND JUSTICE
MINISTERS WHO RESPOND TO CONTINUING ACTION PLAN
REF: SECSTATE 115541
SUMMARY
-----...
17734
2004-06-10
04THEHAGUE1446
Embassy The Hague
UNCLASSIFIED
04SECSTATE115541
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 THE HAGUE 001446
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: KCRM PGOV PHUM SMIG NL
SUBJECT: G/TIP MILLER MEETS DUTCH FOREIGN AND JUSTICE
MINISTERS WHO RESPOND TO CONTINUING ACTION PLAN
REF: SECSTATE 115541
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. During a June 7 meeting with G/TIP Director Miller, Dutch
Foreign Minister Bot and Justice Minister Donner acknowledged
a shared commitment for concrete action against Trafficking
in Persons (TIP). Although critical of the tone and
unilateral nature of the U.S. benchmarks outlined in the TIP
Continuing Action Plan (reftel) and insistent on tackling the
problem in their own way, the Ministers agreed clear
guidelines to measure progress in fighting TIP were
desirable. Both sides agreed to continue their dialogue on
TIP in a constructive manner and expressed confidence we
would come to a solution.
MILLER MEETING WITH FOREIGN AND JUSTICE MINISTERS
--------------------------------------------- --
¶2. The Secretary is considering Tier 1 placement for the
Netherlands in the 2004 TIP Report, with a re-assessment in
November 2004. At the direction of the Deputy Secretary,
G/TIP Director John Miller visited The Hague June 7. With
Amb. Sobel, he met with Dutch Foreign Minister Bot and
Justice Minister Donner to discuss the quantifiable, specific
benchmarks in the TIP Continuing Action Plan (reftel) on
which the Dutch will be evaluated in November. Other U.S.
participants included G/TIP Acting Deputy Director JoAnn
Schneider, EUR/PGI Doug Hoyt, DCM Danny Russel, and Global
Issues officers Drew Mann and Erin Webster-Main. Dutch
participants were P.P. (Peter) van Wulfften Palthe, MFA DG of
Regional Policy and Consular Affairs, Arie Ijzerman, MoJ
Director of International Criminal Affairs & Drugs Policy,
and Marjo Crompvoets, MFA Senior Policy Advisor on Judicial
and Police Cooperation.
¶3. The initial reception by the Dutch was cold with
considerable push back. Both Ministers Donner and Bot
criticized the harsh tone of the benchmarks and the apparent
unilateral imposition of U.S. TIP priorities upon the Dutch.
FM Bot said this is not how sovereign nations should deal
with each other. He acknowledged the terrible scourge of
TIP and reiterated the Dutch commitment to eradicate the
problem. Still, as a sovereign country, Bot said, the
Netherlands would tailor its TIP approach to national
circumstances and priorities. For example, Donner noted the
benchmarks laid a heavy emphasis on licensed brothels in the
Amsterdam Red Light District, when a more pressing concern
for the Dutch was the phenomenon of lover boys preying on
minors, against which the Dutch had undertaken information
campaigns and increased prosecutions.
¶4. Mr. Miller first reviewed the possibility of the Secretary
doing a conditional Tier 1 placement to be reassessed in
November and listed the conditions we felt necessary to
maintain that rating in our evaluation. He expressed
G/TIP,s view that the Dutch decision to legalize
prostitution and maintain a sex industry with zones like the
Amsterdam Red Light District created a magnet for TIP crimes.
As such, the Dutch shouldered special obligations to rid the
legalized sector of TIP victims. The Ministers agreed a link
existed between prostitution and trafficking, but they
distinguished the two activities and stated that licensing
and regulating prostitution was, in fact, a Dutch effort to
stop TIP. The Ministers questioned whether G/TIP,s focus on
legalized prostitution exceeded the Trafficking Victims
Protection Act mandate.
¶5. Both Mr. Miller and the Ministers agreed the goal is to
reduce the number of TIP victims and increase the number of
trafficker prosecutions. In fact, both countries share many
similar tactics in their fight against TIP. Mr. Miller and
the Ministers acknowledged several of the steps indicated in
the benchmarks were, in fact, already being undertaken by the
Dutch.
¶6. Noting the common ground between the two countries in
shared goal and means, Amb. Sobel stressed the need for a
continued real time dialogue on TIP issues. Rather than
relying upon proclamations and gestures, everyone recognized
the importance of establishing concrete, measurable targets
in the TIP effort. Bot and Donner agreed, noting that
progress against TIP is made at the street level, not the
paper level and the Dutch plan to deal with TIP issues in
the expanded EU during the Dutch Presidency. Donner affirmed
that national and EU-wide progress on TIP was a top Dutch
priority and urged that we move forward together on solutions
and avoid problems of tone. The meeting ended with the
promise by both sides to continue talking.
¶7. After the meeting, Mr. Miller indicated to the Amb. and
DCM alternative benchmarks might be acceptable, but the
Deputy Secretary required conditions as substantial, specific
and measurable as the benchmarks outlined in the Continuing
Action Plan. Mr. Miller said he could accept such clearly
defined and measurable alternative benchmarks developed
jointly by the Dutch and U.S. (including G/TIP) if done
quickly (i.e., within a month).
OTHER MEETINGS
--------------
¶8. Prior to his meeting with the Ministers, Mr. Miller toured
De Roggeveen Shelter for victims of domestic violence and
trafficking. He discussed the need for improvements in the
government's B-9 status (e.g., allowing TIP victims to work)
with the shelter's social workers. Following the shelter
visit, Mr. Miller met two former TIP victims who had started
Atalantas, an NGO working to inform other victims of their
rights under Dutch law. They spoke of their particular
efforts to focus more attention on victims rather than
prosecutions by reaching out directly to them, former to
current victim.
¶9. In another meeting, the National Rapporteur told Mr.
Miller of several areas of progress since their last meeting
in September - a new joint investigative team involving
German, Belgian, Bulgarian, Dutch, EUROPOL and EUROJUST
officials to combat TIP; and an EU twinning project with the
U.K. in the Czech Republic. She said her third report would
likely be released during the summer (to include 2002 figures
- final 2003 figures are expected shortly after its
publication). Mr. Miller also met with Rob Coster, National
Police Project Leader for Prostitution and TIP, who discussed
the shift in police focus from the legal to the illegal
prostitution sector (including escort services). Coster also
clarified the Dutch were re-allocating 100 detectives from
the regional level up to the national level to deal more
effectively with transnational crimes such as TIP. Coster
echoed the National Rapporteur,s remarks that the
Netherlands was instituting new TIP demand reduction
programs. Finally, a police tour of Amsterdam,s Red Light
District after the meeting with the Ministers revealed that
police checked all legal brothels for TIP victims once every
six weeks on average.
COMMENT
--------
¶10. Embassy believes the next step is a strong push for
prompt joint development of clear, measurable benchmarks that
closely conform to domestic Dutch realities. This will help
ensure continued bilateral, shoulder-to-shoulder cooperation
in the fight against TIP, and hopefully ease Dutch
pre-occupation with the process of producing our yearly
report. Minister Bot committed the Dutch to attack TIP
during their upcoming EU presidency. With continued
bilateral engagement, the U.S. and the Netherlands will be
able to multiply our individual efforts against TIP at a time
when EU border policies are under review and its enlarged
borders increase the risk of trafficking.
¶11. G/TIP Director Miller has reviewed and cleared this cable.
SOBEL