

Currently released so far... 3891 / 251,287
Articles
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/24
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/10
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Amsterdam
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Consulate Dubai
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Lagos
Mission USNATO
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
USUN New York
USEU Brussels
US Mission Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
UNVIE
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Browse by tag
AF
ASEC
AE
AR
AG
AJ
AFIN
AU
AM
APER
ABUD
ATRN
AORC
AEMR
AMGT
ACOA
AEC
AO
AX
AMED
ADCO
AODE
AFFAIRS
AC
AS
AL
ASIG
ABLD
AA
AFU
ASUP
AROC
ATFN
AGMT
CJAN
CH
CU
CASC
CVIS
CMGT
CO
CI
CLINTON
CIA
CG
CF
CN
CS
CAN
COUNTER
CIS
CA
CBW
CM
CE
CONDOLEEZZA
COE
CR
CY
CD
CTM
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CPAS
CWC
CT
CKGR
CB
CACS
COM
CDG
CJUS
CARSON
COUNTERTERRORISM
CACM
CDB
CV
EU
EFIN
EG
ETTC
EINV
ENRG
EI
ECPS
EINT
ECON
EIND
ETRD
EPET
EUN
EZ
EMIN
ELAB
EAID
EAGR
ET
EC
EAIR
ENVR
ES
ECA
EWWT
ER
ELTN
EFIS
EN
EXTERNAL
ECIN
EINVETC
ENIV
EINN
ENGR
EUR
ESA
ENERG
ELECTIONS
ECUN
EINVEFIN
ECIP
EINDETRD
EUC
EREL
IR
IZ
IS
IT
INRB
IRAJ
IN
INRA
INRO
IO
IC
ID
IIP
IAEA
ITPHUM
IV
IPR
IWC
IQ
ICTY
ISRAELI
IRAQI
ICRC
ICAO
IMO
IF
ILC
IEFIN
INTELSAT
IL
IA
IBRD
IMF
ITALY
ITALIAN
INTERPOL
KE
KTFN
KDEM
KJUS
KNNP
KGHG
KZ
KIPR
KWBG
KIRF
KPAO
KDRG
KHLS
KCRM
KSCA
KPAL
KISL
KG
KACT
KN
KS
KGIC
KRAD
KU
KCOM
KBIO
KMCA
KCOR
KV
KHDP
KTIP
KVPR
KDEV
KWMN
KSPR
KTIA
KHIV
KPRP
KAWC
KOLY
KCIP
KCFE
KOCI
KMDR
KPKO
KTDB
KMRS
KFRD
KLIG
KBCT
KICC
KGIT
KSTC
KUNR
KPAK
KNEI
KSEP
KPOA
KFLU
KNUP
KNNPMNUC
KOMC
KAWK
KO
KTER
KSUM
KHUM
KRFD
KBTR
KDDG
KWWMN
KFLO
KSAF
KBTS
KPRV
KMPI
KNPP
KNAR
KWMM
KERG
KFIN
KTBT
KCRS
KRVC
KR
KPWR
KWAC
KMIG
KSEC
KIFR
KDEMAF
KGCC
KPIN
KNUC
KPLS
KIRC
MARR
MOPS
MU
MASS
MY
MNUC
MCAP
MA
MO
MTCRE
MG
MASC
MX
MCC
MZ
ML
MK
MTRE
MP
MIL
MDC
MTCR
MAR
MEPI
MRCRE
MI
MT
MR
MQADHAFI
MD
MAPS
MUCN
MPOS
MEPP
MOPPS
MAPP
PGOV
PREL
PINR
PO
PINS
PTER
PK
PHUM
PARM
PL
PE
PREF
PHSA
PBTS
PGOF
PROP
PARMS
PA
PM
PMIL
PTERE
POL
PF
PALESTINIAN
PY
PGGV
PNR
POV
PAK
PAO
PFOR
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PNAT
PROV
PEL
POLITICS
PEPR
PSI
PINT
PSOE
PU
POLITICAL
PARTIES
PBIO
PECON
POGOV
PINL
PKFK
SU
SA
SY
SP
SNAR
SENV
SCUL
SW
SOCI
SF
SO
SR
SG
SMIG
SL
SN
SHUM
SZ
SYR
ST
SANC
SC
SAN
SIPRS
SK
SH
SI
STEINBERG
UK
UNSC
UG
US
UZ
UP
UNO
UNMIK
UY
UN
UNGA
UE
UNESCO
UAE
UNEP
USTR
UNHCR
UNDP
UNHRC
USAID
UNCHS
UNAUS
USUN
USEU
UV
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 04THEHAGUE3178, EU/TURKEY: DUTCH ISSUE REV 2 DRAFT TEXT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04THEHAGUE3178.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
04THEHAGUE3178 | 2004-12-06 19:07 | 2011-01-26 17:05 | CONFIDENTIAL | Embassy The Hague |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 THE HAGUE 003178
SIPDIS
SOPHIA FOR BFREDEN FOR A/S JONES
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/07/2014
TAGS: AORC PREL TU CY EUN
SUBJECT: EU/TURKEY: DUTCH ISSUE REV 2 DRAFT TEXT
REF: THE HAGUE 3140
Classi...
23677
2004-12-06
04THEHAGUE3178
Embassy The Hague
CONFIDENTIAL
04THEHAGUE3140
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 THE HAGUE 003178
SIPDIS
SOPHIA FOR BFREDEN FOR A/S JONES
E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/07/2014
TAGS: AORC PREL TU CY EUN
SUBJECT: EU/TURKEY: DUTCH ISSUE REV 2 DRAFT TEXT
REF: THE HAGUE 3140
Classified By: DCM Daniel Russel for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d).
¶1. (C) Rob Swartbol (PM Balkenende's diplomatic advisor)
(STRICTLY PROTECT) told Ambassador Sobel late December 6 he
was alarmed about efforts by France, Austria and Denmark to
promote a third way/privileged partnership alternative for
Turkey. He said that the Dutch were working to get Germany
and the UK together to counterbalance them. Balkenende may
travel to the UK to meet PM Blair on Friday. He will meet
Erdogan in Brussels on Thursday night and plans to see
Schroeder and Chirac next week in capitals.
¶2. In a separate conversation with the DCM, Pieter de
Gooijer (MFA, European Integration) (STRICTLY PROTECT) said
he believed the Turkey accession talks are still on track for
a positive result December 17 although they need careful
steering by the Dutch to keep them there. The Dutch had
reassured the Turks that there was nothing to rumors of Dutch
willingness to support movement toward a third way. The
Dutch will keep holding the line on accession talks leading
to full membership, de Gooijer promised.
CYPRUS AND GREECE
¶3. Swartbol insisted the Turks needed to make a serious
gesture on or before December 17 by agreeing to sign the
Ankara Protocol before the start of negotiations. The Dutch
continued to work hard to prevent others packaging this as a
pre-condition for Turkey. De Gooijer told the DCM that
Turkey has signaled very clearly they can live with the
Cyprus language as it now stands, that is, they tacitly
agree to promise on December 17 that they will sign the
protocol before the starting date. PM Balkenende flies to
Greece and Cyprus tonight to meet Karamanlis Tuesday morning
and Papadopolous Tuesday afternoon. He intends to push hard
against any threatened Cyprus veto. De Gooijer repeated that
some Member States have been pushing for language about the
UN Cyprus Settlement. The Turks had adamantly opposed it,
the GOC had not indicated how they feel and the Dutch
continued to work hard to kill it. Finally, on Greece,
Swartbol told the Ambassador that the Dutch have resisted
Greece's push for stronger language on cross border issues.
(Note: the new draft text adds a reference to referral of
disputes to the ICJ in paragraph 20; see text below.)
PERMANENT SAFEGUARDS ON LABOR - PROBLEM OR CLEVER STRATEGY?
¶4. (C) Swartbol told Ambassador Sobel that Sweden, Finland
and even the UK might be willing to accept permanent
safeguard language stronger than Turkey would accept.
Swartbol seemed very concerned that these countries were
taking such a problematic position. De Gooijer separately
explained that the UK had not rejected safeguards outright.
He took this to mean the UK was taking a softer position on
this issue to bring problem countries along and to help
ensure Turkey gets an unqualified yes with a date. The
British reportedly think some flexibility on safeguards would
make a difference in negotiations.
REDRAFTED COUNCIL CONCLUSIONS PRESENT NO NEW PROBLEMS
¶5. (C) De Gooijer shared the redrafted Council Conclusions
that will be circulated to member states for the December 8
COREPER meeting (full text faxed to EUR/ERA). De Gooijer
said he and the Dutch had been accused by the French and
others of deliberately leaking the previous version to create
favorable momentum for Turkey. On an optimistic note, he
observed that only Austria, France, and Denmark came back
with new language after the last COREPER, where the Dutch
circulated original draft language for the Council decision.
He took this to mean the other 22 Member States could live
with what they had seen, a positive sign for a positive
result on December 17.
¶6. (C) At first glance, non-trivial changes include:
para 17: new language re EU integration and absorption
capacity;
para 18: new language referring to specific Turkish
legislation, close monitoring by the commission, and a
zero-tolerance policy on torture;
para 20: new language on neighborly dispute resolution
including reference to the ICJ;
para 22: tic one: new language describing how the acquis
chapters will be handled; tic five: revised language on
qualified majority voting on the brake; and a new reference
to the European Parliament
¶7. (SBU) BEGIN TEXT OF DRAFT CONCLUSIONS ON TURKEY:
Quote
Turkey
¶17. The European Council recalled its previous conclusions
regarding Turkey, in which at a first stage it agreed that
Turkey was a candidate state destined to join the Union on
the basis of the same criteria as applied to the other
candidate states and, subsequently, concluded that, if it
were to decide at its December 2004 meeting, on the basis of
a report and recommendation from the Commission, that Turkey
fulfills the Copenhagen political criteria, the European
Union will open accession negotiations with Turkey without
delay. It also recalled its previous conclusions that the
Union,s capacity to absorb new members, while maintaining
the momentum of European integration, is also an important
consideration in the general interest of both the Union and
the candidate countries.
¶18. The European Council welcomed the decisive progress
made by Turkey in its far-reaching reform process and
reiterated its determination to enable Turkey to join the
European community of values, confident that Turkey will
sustain the process of reform to that end. Furthermore, it
expects Turkey to actively pursue its efforts to bring into
force the six specific items of legislation identified by the
Commission. To ensure the irreversibility of the political
reform process and its full implementation, notably with
regard to fundamental freedoms and to full respect of human
rights, that process will continue to be closely monitored by
the Commission, which is invited to continue to report
regularly on it to the Council, addressing all identified
points of concern, including the implementation of the
zero-tolerance policy relating to torture and ill-treatment.
¶19. The European Council welcomed Turkey,s (decision) to
sign the protocol regarding the adaptation of the Ankara
Agreement, taking account of the accession of the ten new
Member States.
¶20. The European Council welcomed the improvement in
Turkey,s relations with its neighbours and Turkey,s
unequivocal commitment to good neighbourly relations and its
readiness to continue to work with Member States towards
resolution of border disputes, in conformity with the
principle of peaceful settlement of disputes in accordance
with the United Nations Charter. In accordance with its
previous conclusions, the European Council reviewed the
situation relating to outstanding disputes; in this
connection it reaffirmed its view that unresolved bilateral
issues, which might have repercussions on the accession
process, should if necessary be brought to the International
Court of Justice for settlement.
¶21. The European Council noted the resolution adopted by
the European Parliament on (() December 2005.
(PM: decision, date, process)
Framework for negotiations
¶22. The European Council agreed that accession
negotiations with individual candidate states will be based
on a framework for negotiations. Each framework, which will
be established by the Council on a proposal by the
Commission, taking account of the experience of the fifth
enlargement process, will address the following elements,
according to own merits and specific situations and
characteristics of each candidate state:
-- As in previous negotiations, the substance of the
negotiations, which will be conducted in an Intergovernmental
Conference where decisions require unanimity, will be broken
down into a number of chapters, each covering a specific
policy area. The Council, acting by unanimity on a proposal
by the Commission, will lay down benchmarks for the
provisional closure and, where appropriate, for the opening
of each chapter; depending on the chapter concerned, these
benchmarks will refer to legislative alignment and a
satisfactory track record of implementation of the acquis as
well as obligations deriving from contractual relations with
the European Union.
-- Long transition periods, derogations, specific
arrangements or permanent safeguard clauses may be
considered. The Commission will include these, as
appropriate, in its proposals for each framework, for areas
such as freedom of movement of persons, structural policies
or agriculture. Furthermore, the decision-taking process
regarding the eventual establishment of freedom of movement
of persons should allow for a maximum role of individual
Member States. Transitional arrangements or safeguards
should be reviewed regarding their impact on competition or
the functioning of the internal market.
-- The financial aspects of accession of a candidate state
must be allowed for in the applicable Financial Framework.
Hence, accession negotiations yet to be opened with
candidates whose accession could have substantial financial
consequences requiring financial reform can only be concluded
after the establishment of the Financial Framework for the
period from 2014.
-- (PM: paragraph regarding goal and outcome of
negotiations; ref. COM line: &open-ended process whose
outcome cannot be guaranteed beforehand8)
-- In the case of a serious and persistent breach in a
candidate state of the principles of liberty, democracy,
respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms and the
rule of law on which the Union is founded, the Commission
will, at its own initiative or on the request of the Members
States, recommend the suspension of negotiations and propose
the conditions for eventual resumption. The Council will
decide by qualified majority on such a recommendation, after
having heard the candidate state, whether to suspend the
negotiations and on the conditions for their resumption. The
Member States will act in the IGC in accordance with the
Council decision, without prejudice to the general
requirement for unanimity in the IGC. The European
Parliament will be informed.
-- Parallel to accession negotiations, the Union will engage
with every candidate state in an intensive political and
cultural dialogue. With the aim of enhancing mutual
understanding by bringing people together, this inclusive
dialogue also will involve civil society.
END QUOTE.
RUSSEL